Main Article Content

Abstract

The research explores the ARIMA-OC method (ARIMA based on the Optimal Combination approach) for Hierarchical Forecasting. In this approach, the ARIMA model is used to forecast each individual time series, and the Optimal Combination (OC) technique is applied to merge these initial forecasts into an updated set of predictions. The study compares the ARIMA model with the Exponential Tail Smoothing (ETS) model, with both models being integrated using five different strategies: the Bottom-up approach (BU), the Top-down approach using Forecasted Proportion (TDFP), two Top-down approaches based on Historical Proportions (TDHP1 and TDHP2), and the Optimal Combination approach (OC). To assess how ARIMA-OC performs with small samples, a simulation was carried out, revealing that ARIMA-OC surpasses the other methods according to the MASE metric. Furthermore, non-parametric tests like the Friedman test and the Nemenyi post-hoc test were used to validate the effectiveness of Hierarchical Forecasting.

Article Details

How to Cite
Waciko, K. J., Muayyad, & Susanti, L. A. (2025). Improving Hierarchical Tourism Forecasting through the ARIMA-OC (ARIMA Based on The Optimal Combination) Method. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Statistik Indonesia, 5(3), 438-446. https://doi.org/10.11594/jesi.05.03.02

References

Athanasopoulos, G., Ahmed, R. A., & Hyndman, R. J. (2009), Hierarchical forecasts for Australian domestic tourism. Interna-tional Journal of Forecasting, 25, 146–166.
Athanasopoulos, G., Hyndman, R. J., Kou-rentzes, N., & Petropoulos, F. (2017), Forecasting with temporal hierarchies. European Journal of Operational Re-search, 262(1), 60–74.
Box, G.E.P. and Jenkins, G.M. (1970), Time Se-ries Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Fransisco: Holden-Day, Revised edn,
Friedman, M. (1937). The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Im-plicit in The Analysis of Variance. Journal Amer.Statist. Assoc., 32, 675-701.
Friedman, M. (1940). A comparison of alterna-tive tests of significance for the problem of m rankings. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11:86–92,
Hollander, M. and Wolfe, D.A (1999). Nonpar-ametric Statistical Methods. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, New York.
Hyndman, R. J., Ahmed, R. A., Athanasopoulos, G., & Shang, H. L. (2011). Optimal combi-nation forecasts for hierarchical time se-ries. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 55(9), 2579–2589.
Hyndman, R. J., Lee, A., & Wang, E. (2016). Fast computation of reconciled forecasts for hierarchical and grouped time series. Computational Statistics and Data Analy-sis, 97, 16–32.
Kosiorowski et al. (2017) develop a new non-parametric and robust method of fore-casting hierarchical functional time se-ries.
Mircetic. D, Nikolicic, S, Stojanovic, D & Maslaric, M (2017). Modified topdown

approach for hierarchical forecasting in a beverage supply chain. Transportation Research Procedia 22, 193-202.
Nemenyi, P. Distribution-free Multiple Com-parison (1969). Ph.D.diss., Princeton University.
Shumway R.H and Stoffer D.S. (2006). Time Series Analysis and its Applications with R
Examples. Springer (India) Private Limited, New Delhi.
Waciko, K.J and Ismail B (2020). SARIMA-ELM hybrid model versus SARIMAMLP hybrid model. International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, 5(2): 01-08.
Waciko, K.J & Ismail, B (2019). Panel Data Model for Tourism Demand. Internation-al Journal of Scientific & Technology Re-search Volume 8, Issue 09., 317-323.
Waciko, K.J & Ismail, B (2018). Forecasting International Tourism in Bali. ZENITH In-ternational Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 8 (9), 21-32.